The concept of "Cyber Gattaca" is a futuristic notion that draws its inspiration from the 1997 science fiction film "Gattaca". The film presents a dystopian future where genetic manipulation determines individuals' social status and job prospects. In the context of the workplace, "Cyber Gattaca" refers to the potential use of genetic information to predict and enhance employee performance. However, the application of genetics in this manner is still nascent and raises numerous ethical and scientific controversies. This article will delve into the current state of research on the genetic determinants of workplace performance and discuss the potential implications and controversies of a "Cyber Gattaca" model.
Genetics and Personality Traits
Research has shown that genetics significantly determines personality traits such as conscientiousness and extraversion [1]. For instance, traits such as extraversion, emotional stability, and optimism all have strong physiological components and, in the case of extraversion and emotional stability, have neurological and evolutionary bases as well [2]. Furthermore, it has been found that introverts have higher blood flow to their frontal lobe, the part of the brain that aids in memory and problem-solving. On the other hand, extroverts have a unique reaction to dopamine, a brain chemical that turns on reward and pleasure sensations. While everyone carries the same amount of dopamine, extroverts get an excited buzz from this reward center activation while introverts feel run-down by it [3].
The Genetic Basis of Grit and Neuroticism
Grit, a personality trait characterized by perseverance and passion for long-term goals, is significantly influenced by genetics. It is mostly explained by conscientiousness, another trait that is significantly determined by genetics [4]. Similarly, trait neuroticism, characterized by emotional instability, is also genetically determined [5].
The Role of Genetics in IQ
Intelligence quotient (IQ) is another trait that is significantly influenced by genetics. IQ is the single greatest predictor of success in school and the workplace [6]. Ashkenazi Jews, for example, have the highest average IQ of any ethnic group for which there are reliable data. They score 0.75 to 1.0 standard deviations above the general European average, corresponding to an IQ of 112-115. This has social significance because IQ (as measured by IQ tests) is the best predictor we have of success in academic subjects and most jobs [7].
The Complexity of Personality Genetics
Despite the significant role of genetics in personality traits, current attempts to isolate genes responsible for these traits have shown that personality is complex and cannot be simply explained using a small group of individual genes. The strongest individual genes have little aggregate effect on explaining the variance [8].
The Controversy of "Cyber Gattaca"
The application of genetics in predicting and enhancing workplace performance, akin to a "Cyber Gattaca" model, is a controversial topic. On one hand, understanding the genetic basis of personality traits and cognitive abilities could potentially allow for more effective employee selection and development strategies. On the other hand, the use of genetic information in this manner raises significant ethical concerns. There are fears about genetic discrimination, privacy violations, and the potential for creating a genetic underclass.
Moreover, the science of genetics is still evolving. While we have made significant strides in understanding the genetic basis of certain traits, our ability to predict personality based on sequencing data and bioinformatics is still limited [9]. Furthermore, the interaction between genetics and environment, known as gene-environment interaction, adds another layer of complexity to the equation.
The Ethical Implications of a "Cyber Gattaca" Model
The concept of a "Cyber Gattaca" model, where genetic information is used to predict and enhance workplace performance, raises significant ethical concerns. One of the primary concerns is the potential for genetic discrimination. If employers have access to genetic information about their employees, they could potentially use this information to discriminate against individuals based on their genetic predispositions. This could lead to a situation where individuals are denied employment opportunities based on their genetic makeup, rather than their skills or qualifications.
Another concern is the potential violation of privacy. Genetic information is deeply personal and revealing. If employers have access to this information, it could be used in ways that violate an individual's privacy. For instance, genetic information could potentially be used to determine an individual's susceptibility to certain diseases, which could then be used to make decisions about health insurance coverage or other benefits.
Finally, there is the concern about the creation of a genetic underclass. If genetic information is used to determine employment opportunities, it could lead to a situation where individuals with certain genetic traits are systematically disadvantaged. This could exacerbate existing social inequalities and lead to a society where individuals are judged not on their merits, but on their genetic makeup.
The Impact of IQ on Success and Income
IQ, or intelligence quotient, is a significant predictor of success in both school and the workplace. In fact, cognitive ability has been found to predict income and wealth better than any personality trait. A study found that cognitive ability predicted income (r = 0.34) and wealth (r = 0.40) better than any personality trait (absolute rs from 0.04 to 0.20) [5]. This finding underscores the importance of cognitive ability in determining economic success.
Moreover, IQ is positively related to work performance and income. In a sample of very-high-IQ individuals, a 10-point increase in IQ was associated with about $200,000 higher lifetime earnings. Interestingly, emotional stability and openness to experience were not significantly related to lifetime earnings in this sample [6].
The Myth of Multiple Intelligences
The idea that there are multiple kinds of intelligence, often cited as around eight, has been pervasive for the past 40 years. However, this idea is largely considered a neuromyth. While it is true that people have different strengths and weaknesses, the concept of multiple intelligences often oversimplifies the complexity of human cognitive abilities. In reality, general intelligence, or g, is a better predictor of success in a wide range of areas.
The Future of "Cyber Gattaca"
While the concept of a "Cyber Gattaca" model is intriguing, it is important to remember that the science of genetics is still evolving. Our understanding of the genetic basis of personality traits and cognitive abilities is still limited, and our ability to predict personality based on sequencing data and bioinformatics is still in its infancy. Furthermore, the interaction between genetics and environment, known as gene-environment interaction, adds another layer of complexity to the equation.
As we continue to explore the genetic basis of personality and cognitive abilities, it is crucial to engage in ongoing dialogue about the ethical, social, and legal implications of this research. While the potential benefits of a "Cyber Gattaca" model are tantalizing, it is important to tread carefully. The ethical implications are profound, and the science is still evolving. As we move forward, it will be important to ensure that the use of genetic information in the workplace is done in a way that respects individual rights and promotes fairness and equality. The science is at 1% trait determination--the future is unknown.
References
Lounsbury, J. W., Foster, N., Patel, H., Carmody, P., Gibson, L. W., & Stairs, D. R. (2012). An investigation of the personality traits of scientists versus nonscientists and their relationship with career satisfaction. R&D Management, 42(1), 47-59. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00665.x
Lounsbury, J. W., Loveland, J. M., Sundstrom, E. D., Gibson, L. W., Drost, A. W., & Hamrick, F. L. (2003). An investigation of personality traits in relation to career satisfaction. Journal of Career Assessment, 11(3), 287-307. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1069072703011003005
Lounsbury, J. W., Park, S. H., Sundstrom, E., Williamson, J. M., & Pemberton, A. E. (2004). Personality, career satisfaction, and life satisfaction: Test of a directional model. Journal of Career Assessment, 12(4), 395-406. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1069072704266658
Stahl, A. (2020, September 8). Introvert, Extrovert, And Ambivert… Which Job Is Right For You? Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/ashleystahl/2020/09/08/introvert-extrovert-and-ambivert-which-job-is-right-for-you/?sh=57ce99f16993
Strenze, T. (2007). Intelligence and socioeconomic success: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal research. Intelligence, 35(5), 401-426.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2018). These 3 Personality Traits Affect What You Earn — but Only After Age 40. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2018/04/these-3-personality-traits-affect-what-you-earn-but-only-after-age-40
Romanoff, J. S. (1976) Birth order, family size, and sibling spacing as influences on intelligence and academic abilities of Jewish adolescents. Department of Psychology, Temple University.
Lynn, R. (2004) The Intelligence of American Jews. Personality and Individual Differences 26, 201–206.